|
Capturing the
Friedmans
(2003)
Starring:
Arnold Friedman, Jesse Friedman, Elaine Friedman, David
Friedman, Howard Friedman
Director:
Andrew Jarecki
Rating:
R
Distributor:
HBO Home Video
Release
Date: January 27, 2004
Review posted: January 24, 2004
Spoilers:
Major
Reviewed by
Dennis
Landmann
SYNOPSIS
Despite their
predilection for hamming it up in front of home-movie cameras, the
Friedmans were a normal middle-class family living in the affluent
New York suburb of Great Neck. Yet one day police officers knocked
on their door and arrested both father Arnold and son Jesse on
charges of child molestation. The film follows their story from
the public's perspective and through unique real footage of the
family in crisis, shot inside the Friedman house. As the police
investigate, and the community reacts, the fabric of the family
begins to disintegrate, revealing provocative questions about
truth, justice, family, and truth.
CRITIQUE
Before you begin to
read this, you should know I'm going to discuss the film, the
people it features, and the events it depicts. Those of you who
don't want to know certain things about the film should skip to
the "final thoughts" section of this DVD review to get an idea how
very good this film is.
The tagline for
Andrew Jarecki's Capturing the Friedmans reads, "Who do you
believe?" The question is certainly very relevant in the case of
this documentary, but it's also a question that cannot be easily
answered. One would have to conjure up all the evidence,
testimonies and background, and then make a decision based on
either believability, feelings, or the straight facts. If this
doesn't sound very satisfactory, you're right. The fact of the
matter is, with this film the questions that fit more likely would
be, who do you "want", "can", or "should" believe, or variations
of those words. To get a better sense of things, let me give you
the basic facts of the case against Arnold and Jessie Friedman.
Arnold was a
respected teacher who one day started up a computer class with the
help of his son Jesse. They taught a group of kids once a week how
to work with and play games on the computer. One day Arnold was
arrested by police at his home on charges of obtaining and owning
magazines of child pornography. The postal service investigated
him after intercepting a package from the Netherlands containing
pornographic material. Police later arrived at his home with a
search warrant and found a stack of magazines hidden behind a
piano inside Arnold's basement office.
This lead the sexual
crimes unit of the local police department to investigate Arnold's
tendencies further, eventually interviewing the children attending
his class. Based on the children's testimonies, which were
tremendously horrific and heinous, Arnold and Jesse were arrested
on numerous counts of child molestation and sodomy. Despite
maintaining their innocence, there was nothing they could do to
change the fact that their family was falling apart. Jessie and
his two brothers, David and Seth, didn't really get a long with
their mother Elaine. The marriage between Arnold and Elaine was
crumbling, and got even worse after the arrest. Against the
infuriated community (parents) of Great Neck, the prosecution, and
the police, the only support the Friedmans had came from inside
themselves, yet Elaine just didn't know where to stand on the
matter of her husband.
The important thing
for you to know, which no one questions or argues in the film, is
that Arnold Friedman liked boys. As we find out through the
interview with wife Elaine, as a young boy Arnold experimented
with his sexuality in ways many of us would think bizarre, yet his
situation was different. Living with his younger brother and
mother inside a one-room basement apartment, he was regularly
exposed to sexual acts between his mother and her boyfriend(s).
Well, without giving away any more, let's just say Arnold was a
pedophile, something he admitted and went to therapy for. With
that information, you might get an idea of his fantasies in
regards to boys, yet this doesn't mean to imply he behaved in such
manners in the presence of his three sons. After getting caught
for reading magazines about child pornography, his secret got out
and it destroyed not only him but his whole family. Such is the
tragic story of Capturing the Friedmans, which gives
viewers an intimate portrait of the drama and hysteria experienced
by an ordinary American family.
Director Andrew
Jarecki begins the documentary with the postal service event, and
throughout the film provides more and more background information
about the Friedmans, specifically Arnold, the molestation case,
the evidence, and the thoughts of the major people who were
involved in the case, including Arnold's brother Howard, the
postal inspector, now retired director of the police sex crimes
unit, the assistant district attorney, the judge, an investigative
journalist (who brought up a few interesting arguments), a police
officer, attorneys for both Arnold and Jesse, and others. However,
the main focus of the documentary is bringing the story of the
Friedman family to light.
Through interviews,
and perhaps testimonies, the audience gets to know the family in a
way that is both intriguing and compelling. It's interesting how
well I think I knew these people after watching the film, but also
how they were perceived by others. I think viewers will either be
very involved with them and the story, or be turned off. Make no
mistake, child molestation and sodomy is heinous, and I felt a
little discomforting while watching some of this stuff.
Nevertheless, Capturing the Friedmans is compelling and
involving.
Jarecki makes very
frequent use of footage from the family's many home movies to tell
their story in a more visually-compelling way. The home movies
mainly feature the family on vacation and sometimes they record
get-togethers or talk into the camera. One particular video is
David's diary and Jarecki uses an excerpt in two areas of the
film, one towards the beginning and the second towards the end.
Both excerpts are captivating, yet they also carry a sense of
sadness and hopelessness for David. At another point in the film
we get to see footage of Arnold and his sons inside their home at
the time of the trial where they discuss certain issues. Given the
family's tendency to document events in their lives with the
camera, these scenes are absolutely real and quite compelling to
see, especially because we see them dealing with problems as they
happen, as opposed to hearing about them after the fact. Usually
the interviews set up some of those scenes, but they're always an
incredible insight into the actual "life" of this family.
I could talk a lot
more about the home movies, what they contain, and how they relate
to the documentary, but I figure you get the impact of them by
now. Let me instead focus on the interviews with the people
involved in the events from all sides. Some of the information
coming out of the interviews contradict each other. The police
officers maintain their story is correct, while Jessie is
determined to prove the charges against him are untrue. I say
"story" because every person interprets and remembers events
differently, and one might question the absolute validity of each
sentence or word from these people. Many topics in the film are
deeply personal, and talking about them must've been tough for
everyone, including one former student from the computer class who
chose to be interviewed in a mostly dark room.
At a later point in
the documentary I couldn't help but notice a sense of irony coming
from interviews with several people. The former student
interviewed describes the molestation and sodomy games played
during class, and how Arnold and Jesse raped him. Later you would
see Jessie denying those things every taking place while he was
there. Now I'm not looking to make one person look bad, instead
I'm puzzled as to how incredibly dissimilar the aspects of this
case are. I guess the main question is, how valid are the charges?
Are they exaggerated? Are they genuine or falsified? How reliable
are the testimonies of the kids? What really did happen, or what
did not happen? Any of these questions are compelling in terms of
learning what might be the real truth.
Capturing the
Friedmans is not really intent on finding the answers,
although something inside me would think a filmmaker like Michael
Moore (Bowling for Columbine) or Nick Broomfield (Biggie
& Tupac) would
ask more direct questions and force some of the issues. Instead
the film hints at discrepancies in the prosecution's case against
Arnold and Jesse. In fact, there are several passages where one
might argue the whole legitimacy of the charges. As Jesse argues
for his case, these children never said a word about being
molested or sodomized to their parents or anyone else until they
were interviewed by police. Interestingly, it seems the approach
used by police was more "this happened, didn't it", which was
implying, as opposed to "what or did anything happen?", which
seems much more effective and rational in a case like this,
especially concerning children.
Hell, I could be
here until tomorrow, so I'm just going to end the review at this
point. I think by now you get the whole picture, or perhaps you
know too much already and I've spoiled the film for you. Then
again, I stated this would be more of a discussion than a review.
In one sentence, Capturing the Friedmans is a compelling
and intimate portrait of a family who experienced an event that
forever changed their lives.
THE VIDEO
HBO presents Capturing the
Friedmans in 1.85:1 anamorphic widescreen. The video ranges
from actual film to home video footage of the Friedmans, which
ranges from 8mm to 16mm film. The quality of the home video
footage is fine, and as one would expect there is less clarity
and detail, yet in the overall sense it looks fine. Grain is
evident in most shots, but that's alright, and some specks also
appear. Actual documentary footage looks quite nice, with some
nice colors and good detail. Sharpness looks good, but sometimes
the picture is a tad bit soft. A few specks occur here also, but
none are distracting. Black levels and dark tones are fine
during the fade out transitions in the film. Overall, this is a
pretty good presentation that speaks to the material.
THE AUDIO
HBO presents Capturing the
Friedmans in English 5.1 Dolby Surround Sound. The audio is
mostly front-heavy, seeing as how most of the film consists of
interviews. Dialogue is clear and easy to understand as far as
the documentary footage is concerned. Some pieces of
conversation in the home video footage is a little quiet and
hard to make out, but small white subtitles make up for it.
Andrea Morricone's effective score is handled nicely in this
soundtrack presentation, with some passages penetrating the
soundfield a little bit. Surrounds are not necessarily active
throughout the show, the rear speakers rarely give off minor
sounds. Essentially, with this being a documentary film, I
didn't expect anything extraordinary in terms of audio, but
HBO's presentation is just fine considering the material.
An English Dolby
Surround track is also available.
THE EXTRAS
This release
could've easily been barebones if it weren't for the people who
lead discussions inside theaters after the showings, which
Andrew Jarecki attended. So here we are with a 2-disc set DVD
that is quite
loaded with bonus material.
In fact, Andrew
Jarecki and the filmmaking crew went back to shoot new things,
score, and edit for a period of six months to create this set.
As stated by Jarecki in the DVD's press release attachment,
"With [the discussions] in mind, we decided that the DVD for
'Capturing the Friedmans' would have to address all these issues
directly. In this way, the DVD could be customized to the
audience." Great idea!
If you were were intrigued by
the film,
you'll definitely want to check out the wealth of additional
information and footage on disc 2, but let's go in
order. First and foremost, let me tell you the menus are very
creative and scored beautifully by Andrea Morricone.
The extras start
off on disc 1 with an informative and interesting audio commentary by director Andrew
Jarecki and editor/co-producer Richard Hankin. They delve
into many subjects, like dealing with the Friedmans and the
production, which took over three years. Also discussed are
production issues and experiences, as well as background
information and their thoughts about the film. Overall, a very
engaging track that's highly recommended.
Disc 2, or
otherwise referred to as "Capturing the Friedmans - Outside the
Frame", is broken down into several sections.
The Discussion:
An Altercation at
the New York Premiere (9:21) happens at the Tribeca Film
Festival during the discussion of the film after the screening.
Several audience members pose questions and exchange arguments
to and with the filmmakers, the people of the prosecution
(investigators, judge, prosecutors, etc), and David Friedman.
The Judge Speaks
Out (6:15) takes place at the film's premiere in Great Neck.
At a post-screening discussion
Judge
Abbey Boklan gives her reaction. Andrew Jarecki defends the film
by answering her criticism that the film omitted critical
information in regards to the Friedmans and their guilt.
Answers to
Frequently Asked Questions (6:19) starts off with a text
menu listing several questions. Select a question and a brief
video clip will answer it. The questions are:
-
How did
the film come to be?
-
Where
did the computer games come from?
-
What is
the relationship between family members today?
-
Why did
the Friedmans film themselves?
-
Why
didn't Seth Friedman participate in the film?
-
What
was Jesse's life like in prison?
Charlie Rose
Interviews Andrew Jarecki (19:15) is an interesting,
informative, and natural discussion about the film, the events,
and many other things.
Unseen Home
Movies:
Passover Sedar
(2:14) features more footage of the heated discussion
between the family that night.
Grandma Speaks
(0:27) is what it is. Not that interesting.
Jesse's Last Night
(3:18) is more of Jesse talking to the camera and getting things
ready before his departure.
The Case:
The Investigation
(8:17) adds a lot more background and additional information on
the case. Jesse notes an interesting approach of the police
officers as they searched his room for suggestive material. It's
also interesting to note that the police alleged the Friedmans
videotaped the children they were accused of molesting, but
eventually nothing materialized. There is also discussion about
the interviewing of the children; an excerpt of a secretly taped
interview with one boy is pretty telling, not to mention
alarming, as to how zealous some parts of the investigation were
conducted by the interviewees).
Additional
Suspects (7:17) informs that the police alleged three other
young men were accomplices to Arnold and Jesse, and charges were
brought against one of them. The additional interviews and
footage here is very interesting, and certainly raises a lot of
new questions against the police's investigation of the case.
Great Neck
Outraged (3:53) is pretty self-explanatory. Specifically,
three excerpts of phone messages are played, and they are quite
upsetting.
A Principal
Witness for the Prosecution (3:32) refers to the one
student in the film who gave testimony that lead to 35 counts of
sodomy. New interview footage with this person sounds ludicrous
and exaggerated, some of his stories are outrageous. Can this
guy be believed, or is he making up these images from the past?
If you ask me, he is full of crap. I don't know, it's his words
against those of Arnold and Jesse.
The Family:
This area contains
home movie footage of various events in the lives of the
Friedmans.
Arnold -
Arnie's Party (3:43) is footage of his retirement as a
teacher, Anatomy of a Pedophile (1:07) concerns the
revealing letter Arnold sent from prison to Jesse's attorney,
and Arnie's Last Letter from Prison (1:03) is exactly
what it says.
Elaine -
The Newlyweds (2:48) is footage of the newly married couple
on vacation, Elaine Overwhelmed (2:33) discusses her
consideration to commit suicide at one point, and Elaine
Arrested (1:51) examines briefly her arrest for allegedly
"obstructing justice".
Jessie -
Jesse's First Days Out of Prison (4:25) shows through
footage shot by David how he tries to adjust to a new life.
Jesse's Life Today (5:59) begins in September 2003 with him
recounting what he has done for the past 22 months in terms of
his parole conditions to working on a fund raiser to meeting
lawyers and discuss the filing of a motion to get his case
re-examined. Jesse Looks Back (5:45) features him looking
back on his decision to plead guilty, his interview with Geraldo
Rivera (plus footage is shown), and other things.
David -
"Just a Clown" (20:11) is the short film about birthday
clowns that Andrew Jarecki was making when he discovered David
Friedman's secret story. Interesting stuff, fun to watch.
The Score - This featurette (7:19)
concerns the recording of the film's score in Rome with composer
Andrea Morricone, who is interviewed. Jarecki and Richard Hankin
film themselves as they drive through Rome to meet with Andrea
and his orchestra inside the recording studio.
Rounding out the
extras is the film's
theatrical trailer (2:08) can be found on disc 1, and the
DVD-ROM material listed on disc 2 features original
documents from police case files and the Friedman archives. It
can be accessed from your ROM drive. DVD credits are also
listed.
A very cool
fold-out booklet features a New Yorker article excerpt,
and lists both scene selections and all the features on both
discs, including the running time of each extra and DVD-ROM
material.
Menus are animated
and easy to navigate.
You can select to view the film with English subtitles. The
107-minute feature is organized into ten chapters.
FINAL THOUGHTS
As you may figure from
my discussion above, Capturing the Friedmans is
quite intriguing, interesting, mysterious, and compelling. Certain
aspects of it might unsettle you somewhat, but there is no denying the
fact that director Andrew Jarecki has presented us with possibly the
most intimate portrait of a family who experienced both a great life
and an even greater tragedy. HBO's video/audio presentations are
perfectly fine considering the material. The extras on disc 2 are a
bit overwhelming, but in general they are interesting and great to
have. This DVD is recommended at the highest level. A purchase is well
worth it.
VERDICT: DVD
COLLECTOR SERIES
Home | Back to Top |