|
Catwoman
(2004)
Rating:
PG-13
Distributor:
Warner Home Video
Release
Date: January 18, 2005
Review posted: January 17, 2005
Reviewed by
Dylan Grant
SYNOPSIS
Patience Philips is
dead – and more alive than ever. Murdered after she learns the secret
behind a cosmetic firm’s anti-aging cream, she’s revived and empowered
by mystical felines. Now she’s on the slinky prowl for adventure and
revenge. She’s Catwoman.
CRITIQUE
A Catwoman
film has been talked about for years, ever since Michelle Pfeiffer
brought the character to brilliant life in Batman Returns in
1992. Pfeiffer was originally set to reprise the role, then there
were rumors that Ashley Judd was going to play the part. The project
floundered, languishing for years on the Warner Brothers shelf, until
now. Rather than do justice to the character by keeping it true to
its comic book roots, the decision was made along the way to change
just about everything: the character’s name (from Selina Kyle to the
ridiculous Patience Philips), the suit, giving the character
superhuman abilities, and just about everything else. The
comic-to-screen changes are trivial. If one has to be familiar with
the source material in order for the film to make any sense, the film
fails. No, Catwoman fails for many other reasons.
Patience Philips is
a meek design artist for a big cosmetics firm, Hedare Beauty, run by
the tyrannical Georges Hedare (Lambert Wilson), and his wife, the face
of Hedare, Laurel (Sharon Stone). One night, while delivering some
last minute designs, Patience stumbles upon the film’s lame, hackneyed
plot: the hot new Hedare product, a cream that reverses aging
has deadly side effects. Chased by some Hedare lackeys, Patience
falls out of a drainpipe to her death. Luckily for her, a group of
stray cats swarm in and resurrect her. In addition to restoring her
life, the cats also imbue Patience with some phenomenal abilities:
superior fighting skills, she can ride a motorcycle like she was born
to… and she plays a mean game of hoops. In one of the more ridiculous
filler scenes in the film (of which there are many), Patience and her
love interest, city cop Tom Lone (Benjamin Bratt), take each other on
in a highly sexual game of basketball. Patience dominates, dribbling
all over the court, bouncing off walls, and backing it up all over
Lone, all in full few of the young children playing near by.
The feeling of
dread around this film began in 2003, when pictures of Halle in the
cat suit popped up on the Web. From that moment, one could almost
hear the collective groan going out from comic buffs and casual
viewers alike. The suit is trashy, less sensual than full out S&M,
built show off as much of Halle as possible. She even has a whip,
which she flashes with great proficiency, but never really uses for
anything. Halle is gorgeous, but showing off how good she looks seems
to be the only point of the suit. It just doesn’t work, as though
they were trying too hard.
In a big comic book
adaptation like this, you would think that at the very least you would
be able to expect some decent special effects, some cool CGI,
especially when the man directing the film created the visual effects
for such films as Alien: Resurrection and The Messenger.
Well, you would be wrong. The effects in this film are not just bad.
They are laughable. They do not blend well with the rest of the film,
and the transition from live action to CGI is so obvious that it takes
the viewer out of the movie, as though Real Halle was replaced by
Playstation Halle for all the big scenes. There is also too much CGI
though maybe it just seems that way because it is so bad.
Everything from city establishing shots to some of the cats are
computer generated. It all feels overused, directorial laziness.
I hate to be
simplistic, but so much of Catwoman is so unbelievably dumb, so
jaw-droppingly stupid, that it is hard to imagine that someone wrote
it and showed it to someone else, who said, “Yes! We’re going to
shoot this!” Everything from the painfully two dimensional
characters to the cheap, faux-feminist jabs the film takes (“I’m a
woman. I’m used to doing all kinds of things I don’t want to do.”),
to the story that feels made up as it went along, there is little
redeeming about this turkey. Even the pacing is horrible.
Catwoman is of about average length, but it feels so much longer.
The direction, by a one-named Frenchman called Pitof (a nickname, of
course, but who could blame him for not wanting his real name on this
catastrophe) is indescribably inept. He does not seem to have the
slightest idea how to capture anything human, and everything ends up
looking like a cliched music video.
If there is
anything about this film that makes it fun to watch, it is the camp
value. It is possible to have fun with this movie if you lower
your expectations. No, rather, if you let your expectations go all
together, there is something to laugh at here. The problem is that
the film takes itself way too seriously. If they would have played up
the camp even more, they might have had something. (Consider the
original Batman, made in 1966. That film wore its camp
sensibilities like a badge of honor, and it is all the more classic
because of that.) The basketball scene is hilarious, as is every
scene with Halle in her cat suit (that mask!). Only Sharon Stone, as
the evil Laurel, seems to realize what the filmmakers had on their
hands, and she plays the silliness in every scene she is in. Stone is
fun to watch, if only because behind the act she seems to be laughing
at the material.
Catwoman
is bad in just about every way a film can be. One can picture
Michelle Pfeiffer and the other actresses who have been considered for
the role breathing a sigh of relief at the fact that the project
passed them by. The film is not helped by the fact that Halle’s
performance is nowhere near the same universe as Pfeiffer’s; Ms. Berry
seems horribly miscast. While Spiderman 2 showed how a comic
book film can be great, Catwoman provides us with a blueprint
of how not to make a film. Catwoman leaves the door open for a
sequel, which, if there is a god, we’ll never see.
THE VIDEO
Catwoman
is presented in the original 2.35:1 aspect ratio. The transfer is
quite good, and all the color levels come through sharply. The black
levels are good, and the overall picture is crisp.
THE AUDIO
This DVD offers
English and French tracks, both presented in Dolby Digital 5.1. The
presentation is solid, and all the effects come through sharply. All
channels come through well, and the sound effects are crisp. It’s
funny that a film this bad gets a technical presentation that is this
good.
THE EXTRAS
The Many Faces of
Catwoman:
A history of the character, from her first appearance in DC Comics up
to this film. DC executives, writers and artists talk about the
evolution and significance of the character. We also hear from the
women who have breathed life into Catwoman over the years: Julie
Newmar, Lee Meriwether, Eartha Kitt, Adrienne Barbeau, Michelle
Pfeiffer, and Halle Berry.
Behind-the-Scenes
Documentary:
Talks about recreating the character, building the suit, and what they
were trying to accomplish with this film.
Additional Scenes:
Five deleted scenes and alternate cuts, including an alternate ending.
Theatrical Trailer:
The original theatrical trailer.
The bonus material
on this disc is more interesting than the film itself, particularly
the “Many Faces” featurette, and probably the only point of interest
here.
FINAL THOUGHTS
Catwoman
is a mess from the ground up. The few instances of campy fun are far
outweighed by the film’s greater overall failings. The bonus material
is interesting in spite of the film, but not so much so that they
would make this DVD worth picking up. Lovers of bad movies might be
interested in this, but otherwise, don’t bother.
VERDICT: SKIP IT
Home | Back to
Top |