|
Lois & Clark
-
Season 1
Rating:
NR
Distributor:
Warner Home Video
Release
Date: June 7, 2005
Review posted: June 26, 2005
Reviewed by
Keith Helinski
SYNOPSIS
Casting a
fresh look on a timeless legend, this exciting, action-packed update
of the DC Comics Superman captures the daring exploits of the
mysterious visitor from another planet and brings the city of
Metropolis to life. Originally aired in the 90's on ABC, this
humorously romantic action/adventure hour-long series puts a modern
twist on the time-honored, legendary superhero, bringing to life the
comic book characters Clark Kent (Dean Cain); his superhuman
alter-ego, Superman; and Lois Lane (Teri Hatcher), fiction's first
lady of the press, in the most unrequited romance of all time.
CRITIQUE
Unlike all the
TV shows to DVD sets in the past I’ve reviewed, this was one show I
wasn’t too familiar with. I remember it was very popular little more
then ten years ago (as I was a kid), but was never interested in it
for whatever reason. Since Smallville debut and rekindle my love for
Superman, I became real anxious on seeing this show on DVD, as I was
intrigued. As I finally got the chance, I took my time analyzing this
show through and through.
This is the
kind of storytelling that you really have to suspend all disbelief and
have some imagination. The story lines tend to get a bit corny, not
as bad as some of the real bad episodes in Smallville, but close
enough. It’s the cast and the direction of the show that really makes
the whole thing work.
The writing is
without a doubt, sloppy. Even if you aren’t familiar with the
Superman mythology, you watch this show and soon enough realize how
the writers handled the “origins” side of Superman is very choppy and
sloppy. Ironically, though, that’s the parts that I find
fascinating.
Unlike
Smallville, which has a theatrical tone to it, this show feels like a
TV show. The setting, the effects, the acting. 70 percent of the
film takes place in the Daily Planet (the show could have been called
“THE DAILY PLANET” and worked just fine). Superman is not the main
focus of the show. It’s the glue that holds the show together but
isn’t the heart itself. The two main characters Lois Lane and Clark
Kent is the focus of the show. They are in it 70 percent of the
series. It’s actually quite enjoyable. On the other hand, without
the tidbits of Superman, the show doesn’t even really reflect the
Superman mythology at all. In fact – it disregards any past knowledge
of the Superman orgins and sometimes makes its own (much like
Smallville did).
I probably
wouldn’t like this show if it wasn’t for Teri Hatcher, Dean Cain, and
Lane Smith.
Hatcher plays
probably one of the best Lois Lane’s of the entire Superman history.
I’m sure that’s a bold statement but seriously, she is the most
realistic of all. Sexy, a smart-ass, and fast; like what Lois Lane
is. Dean Cain plays a mediocre Superman (unbelievable and almost
silly) but as Clark Kent, he isn’t too bad. The
late great Lane Smith (who recently died) steals the show. He plays
the unorthodox editor-and-chief Perry White.
Another great
quality of this show is perhaps John Shea as Lex Lurthor. This
version of Lex is not some silly over-the-top comical relief that was
presented in the Superman movies. This version probably mirrors (and
only real similarity) the comics well. This Lex is what Lex really
is; pure evil. He is manipulative, smart, and completely insane. And
what’s really neat about it is no one really knows it besides Superman
(near the tail end of the pilot, Superman approaches Lex regarding
that very thing, which reminded me of a similar scenario in the pilot
episode for the Animated Series a few years after this show aired).
What I also find unique about this is the contrast to Smallville
regarding Lex. In Smallville, Lex is this baby-face person that is
slowly but surly falling to the dark side – and is friends with Clark (everyone besides Clark is
cautious when it comes to Lex). It’s the complete opposite in Lois
and Clark, Lex is friends with Lois and everyone adores Lex (besides
Clark/Superman – who is cautious in regards to Lex).
One last
contrast between Smallville and Superman is the episodes themselves.
About the majority of the problems that occurs in Smallville is
reflected toward the meteor shower [rocks]. About the majority of the
problems that occurs in Lois and Clark is a scheme Lex Luthor is
behind.
The show by a
long shot isn’t great. The story lines tends to be more silly then
even Smallville. The effects is completely awful (which for sure,
dates the show but not acceptable since even the outdated effects in
the Superman films still looks good after all this time). The way the
writers approach the origin side of Superman is completely insulting
in some ways.
On the other
hand, it’s real enjoyable – somewhat funny – and it’s the
actors/actresses that makes it work. The right cast can make a simply
crappy script look good when done right. And that’s the case with this
show. And I guess it's a fresh new view regarding the Superman
storytelling.
I also found
the journalism side of it interesting. For some oddball reason,
newspaper shindigs are always in the mix when it comes to superheroes
and their worlds. This is the first time journalism has a serious look
in a superhero atmosphere.
THE VIDEO
Warner presents
Lois & Clark in 1.33:1 fullscreen format. In a nutshell, the
picture quality looks terrible. Some shots look completely faded
while other shots don’t. So it’s not balanced very well. On one
hand, it dates the show pretty well and that may be a good thing but
only if you want a good trip back to the early 90s. On the other
hand, it’s because of the picture quality that makes the special
effects even more terrible. Had the quality been enhanced and
remastered a bit (maybe even darkening the picture a tad bit), the
show would look real slick. To give you an example on that, take the
original Star Trek series for instance. The effects are
completely outdated by today’s standard (which is understandable,
seeing as though it’s a 60s TV show). Since Paramount took the time
remastering the picture quality, the show as a whole looks fantastic
and even the effects look good. So this show should have been given
the love and treatment it deserves.
THE AUDIO
Warner presents
Lois & Clark in Dolby Digital 2.0 Stereo. Another flaw is the
sound. It just does not sound good in stereo. Hopefully they fix
these things for the second season release. But just the same,
dialogue is heard with clarity. The music blends in nicely, but the
sound effects are choppy and sometimes distorted.
THE EXTRAS
• Commentary
on the pilot by Dean Cain, executive producer Deborah Joy LeVine, and
director Robert Butler
• From Rivals
to Romance: series retrospective documentary
• "Taking
Flight: The Visual Effects of Lois & Clark"
• Original
pilot presentation introduced by Deborah Joy LeVine
• Interviews
with Dean Cain and Teri Hatcher
•
Limited-quantity commemorative bonus disc containing the
never-before-released-on-DVD Smallville episode "Crusade"
The commentary
is average; insightful but an overall yawn. The “Taking Flight”
featurette is interesting. Obviously, with a limited budget and the
time period, there really isn’t much they could do.
The original
pilot presentation has an interesting story behind it. The producer
of the show (Joy LeVine) was asked to present the show to Comic Con at
the time and this was the actual reel that was presented.
Interviews
with Cane and Hatcher are insightful to say the least.
I guess the
only thing that is worth while on the set itself is the retrospective
documentary. I wish all TV shows to DVD do this. While I wouldn’t
call it “the best” documentary I’ve seen but for a TV show on DVD,
it’s certainly among one of the best. All of the elements reflecting
the show are answered in this piece. And it’s cool seeing the cast
and crew telling tales ten years later.
I guess one of
the highlights is the bonus disc of the first episode of Smallville
season 4. I could review that episode alone but figured let it wait
till when season 4 comes out on DVD later this summer. It’s great,
however, to compare/contrast everything from effects to writing and
such. I wish WB did this more often – giving the buyer options.
FINAL
THOUGHTS
Unlike all the other superheroes out there (including
Batman), Superman seems to be recreated and revamped the most. Every
era or decade has in some capacity a recreation of Superman for that
time. For a character that was inspired by war and was created to
symbolize the great hope of America, it’s always neat to see different
interpretations of the character. Lois & Clark is not a great
interpretation by a long shot, but it is very enjoyable for what it is
worth which makes it a fine rental.
VERDICT: RECOMMENDED
Home | Back to
Top |