|
Yuri Nosenko:
Double Agent
(1986)
Starring:
Tommy Lee Jones, Oleg Rudnik, Josef Sommer
Director:
Mick Jackson
Rating:
PG
Distributor:
Artisan Home Entertainment
Release
Date: January 20, 2004
Review posted: February 18, 2004
Spoilers:
None
Reviewed by
Gregory L.
Amato
"Everybody covers his ass Steve, including Mr.
Hoover. It’s not just a commie trick."
SYNOPSIS
Based on real events during the Cold War, Steve
Daley (Tommy Lee Jones) is a CIA officer stationed in
Geneva who is approached by Yuri Nosenko (Oleg Rudnik), a
high-level KGB agent willing to sell information. After President
Kennedy is killed, Nosenko asks for asylum and offers information
on the assassination and more, including the names of potential
agents to recruit. But the more time Daley spends with Nosenko,
the more suspicious he becomes of the legitimacy of his claims. Is
Nosenko really a defector, or a false agent sent to mislead US
intelligence?
CRITIQUE
It’s too bad that the film is being marketed as a “Roller
coaster ride of political intrigue.” The film is somber in
nearly every sense of the word, and one thing it is definitely
not is exciting. That isn’t necessarily a bad thing, especially
considering the subject matter. Just understand that you are
getting a re-creation of a historical espionage case, not a spy
thriller like any of the 007 movies. As a presentation of actual
events, the film is disturbing in its portrayal not of Soviet
spies but of American counterintelligence.
Anyone with a historical interest in espionage or the Cold War period
will likely find Nosenko more useful than average moviegoers.
It’s just too confusing to be understood on a first viewing for anyone
not familiar with the historical events. Part of the problem is the
overall pace—the film is only an hour and a half long, but it contains
so many important characters and crucial dialogue that it’s difficult
to keep up. Another problem is that the quality of the audio just
isn’t very good. With no subtitles, you will end up having to replay
some scenes several times in order to make sense out of something that
is barely audible, unintelligible, or both.
For anyone patient enough to deal with the DVD, Nosenko does
tell an interesting and coherent (if complicated) true story. Problems
that usually plague historical dramas are thankfully absent; the story
is not oversimplified, and the history is not sugarcoated with an eye
towards making the US look good. The film is almost as much a
documentary as it is a dramatic recreation of actual events. Sometimes
this works out for the better and tells a compelling story or makes
the characters more human than they would be in a History channel
special. Unfortunately it sometimes tries to cram so much information
into the plot that missing a single sentence can be a real problem.
THE VIDEO
Artisan presents Yuri Nosenko: Double Agent
in the original 1.33:1 fullscreen (it was originally made for
television). Colors are not particularly bright, but seem
acceptable, especially for establishing the feel of the Cold War
era. Sharpness is okay but not great, definitely showing its age.
Most of the footage is fairly grainy, but there is nothing that
would make the video component itself particularly unwatchable.
THE AUDIO
Artisan presents Yuri Nosenko: Double Agent
in English 2.0 Digital Stereo Sound. Missing out on 5.1 Surround
Sound is probably irrelevant because the film is all
dialogue. The main problem in some sequences is that the audio
often lacks clarity, making it difficult to understand what
characters are saying in a few scenes.
THE EXTRAS
A press release for Yuri Nosenko: Double Agent claims that
the DVD “Boasts an arsenal of special features.” I took that to
mean that it should have a lot of special features. Perhaps I
read the wrong definitions of “Boasts” and “arsenal,” because
there are no special features on the DVD at all. Nada. Zip. You
get two choices on the main menu: Play Movie and Scene
Selection. There aren’t even any subtitles, which would have
helped immensely in certain scenes. Saying that 2.0 digital
audio and “Full Screen Version” are part of an arsenal of
special features makes me wonder why Artisan didn’t also include
“Hole in the middle of the disk” on their list of “Special
Features.”
Considering the complexity of the film, the historical nature of
the material, and the contemporary implications of the events
portrayed, one might think this would be a prime candidate for some
interesting features, but unfortunately there are none. This is
especially frustrating because the film was originally made in 1986,
before the collapse of the
Soviet
Union, yet there is nothing to tell us about what information may have
been unearthed afterwards to shed light on some of the film’s loose
ends.
FINAL THOUGHTS
Yuri Nosenko:
Double Agent
appears to take great pains not to dumb down its subject matter and
present its characters and events as accurately as possible, so it may
make great viewing for history buffs and students. Unfortunately it is
a difficult movie to watch without already having some understanding
of the events it portrays, and may require multiple viewings just to
understand what exactly was going on. If you want James Bond, this is
not for you, but if you’re interested real espionage cases, Nosenko
may be exactly what you’re looking for.
VERDICT: ONLY FOR
THE MOTIVATED
Home |
Back to Top |