|
Alexander
(2004)
Starring:
Colin Farrell,
Angelina Jolie, Val Kilmer, et al.
Director:
Oliver Stone
Rating: R
Distributor:
Warner Bros.
Release Date:
11.24.04
Review
Posted:
11.27.04
By
Gregory L. Amato
The Anti-Patton
Epics are everywhere. Set your movie in olden times (we’ve seen
Scottish,
Roman, and
Greek variations of this already, just to name a few), do up some
huge battle scenes, and extend the film to three hours or so, and
voila, you have an epic.
Alexander breaks new ground in being the first epic soap opera.
That’s not completely fair; there is probably far too much
self-important speechifying in Alexander to have it qualify as
a soap opera. Then again, the amount of time spent on battles and
conquest is small compared to that spent on how much Alexander (Collin
Farrell,
S.W.A.T.,
Phone Booth) and his male lover Hephaistion (Jared Leto,
Panic Room,
Requiem for a Dream) can furrow their brows before they cry.
Director Oliver Stone (Any
Given Sunday,
The People vs. Larry Flynt) makes a sizeable misstep in this
biopic of Alexander the Great by talking about too much and showing us
too little. Alexander’s mother Olympias (Angelina Jolie,
Sky Captain,
A Shark Tale) hates his father Philip (Val Kilmer,
Spartan,
The Salton Sea), and Alexander is often caught in the middle.
Olympias’ scheming, almost incestuous relationship with her son is
more of a focus than Alexander’s grand schemes of empire or certainly
of his background as a conqueror-in-the-making. Kilmer mostly
staggers around drunk and gives no indication of how he might have
come to power in the first place, and I can’t help but think that as a
military leader born from a powerful father, wouldn’t Alexander’s
relationship with Philip have been a bit more important?
Who knows. In any case, Stone wants to paint an altogether
different portrait of Alexander, one that focuses on his inner
conflicts and his dreams. The result is a film that plays out like a
soft and fuzzy version of Patton, where instead of a gruff and
abrasive general who wants men to fight for him, not to love him, we
see one who conquers people so that even more will flock to his cities
and fawn over his name. We see Alexander lay out a longshot plan of
attack against the armies of
Persia,
and we see him ride out with his cavalry, but we don’t see what made
him a great general. Ambition might explain the extent his empire
reached, but not how he managed to never lose a battle. We also hear
an aging Ptolemy (Anthony Hopkins,
The Human Stain,
Red Dragon) talk about Alexander’s brutal treatment of some of
the lands he conquered, but the director is careful never to show us
any cases where his beloved, dreaming protagonist did wrong to those
he conquered. Those are the “exceptions,” he says, after rattling off
about half a dozen of them.
The main problem with Alexander is not that it deals with
bisexuality, as seems to be very popular to talk about in the absence
of any substantial discussion. In fact, it seems very strange indeed
that anyone can see a movie about an ancient Macedonian and then be
shocked that he’s portrayed as having had sex with another man.
Alexander’s difficulty is that it isn’t very exciting, or even
particularly interesting or insightful. Old Ptolemy’s lecture on
dreamers at the end of the film isn’t nearly deep enough to warrant
the wait, and by then we’re left wondering if the point of this movie
was really to show us Alexander the Great, or if it was just to show
off.
Film
Rating:
ê1/2 (out of
5)
Home | Back to Top |