?

 

Behind Enemy Lines (2001)

 

Starring: Owen Wilson, Gene Hackman, David Keith
Director: Jon Moore

Rating: PG-13

Studio: 20th Century Fox

Review Posted: 12.4.01

Spoilers: Some

Rating: 1.5/4

 

By Craig Younkin.

Action movies have become a commodity since the September 11th attacks, especially those films about Military men overcoming tremendous odds and beating higher forces. October's "The Last Castle" tried to capture this ra ra American spirit and this month's "Behind Enemy Lines" is just another film meant to capitalize on this new Military craze. Just it ends up being just as ridiculous as "Last Castle."


Owen Wilson stars as Lt. Chris Burnett, a pilot stationed on the U.S.S Carl Vinson, an air craft carrier almost right next door to Bosnia. Burnett is the cocky young pilot who spends his days doing practice runs and going through the regular routine. But like all young men in movies like this, he is bored by the constant waiting around, and wants to fight for his country.


This makes him a constant problem for his commanding officer, Admiral Leslie Reigart (Gene Hackman). Reigart knows that Burnett has the drive, but he doesn't think he has the skills to last two seconds in a real war. He decides to give the restless pilot a mission though, and before he knows it, Burnett is crossing a no-fly zone, and photographing a bunch of Bosnian soldiers burying dead bodies.


When the Bosnians see his plane, they shoot it down, and then lead an effort to make sure that both Chris and his partner are dead. While his partner doesn't make it, Chris manages to escape to the hills and contact Reigart.


Upon hearing the news, Reigart is ready to load up and bring his boy back. But before he can do that, he finds out that going into Bosnia will be a violation of the peace keeping agreement the U.S has with Bosnia. This forces Burnett to fend for himself, and also try to ditch an assassin hot on his tail.


"Behind Enemy Lines" feels like a trap for actors. It completely denies them the ability to express their skills as much as it just allows them to go through the motions of the generic good guys vs. bad guys plot.  The story, by David Veloz and Zak Penn, is enough to satisfy a Chuck Norris film and the character development is severely lacking.


The only thing Owen Wilson must do is go through one over-stylized, and thus unbelievable, action sequence after another (his cynical wit makes him reasonably entertaining though). The villains barely seem to exist as anything other than men with guns saying "find him, find him". And Gene Hackman is barely given anything to do, and says some of the worst dialogue since his role in "The Replacements."


First time director John Moore manages to show his inexperience behind the camera, as he tries to add tension by putting in unbelievably dumb looking action sequences, such as the main character constantly managing to dodge bullets and exploding land mines. Were supposed to feel that Burnett is in some kind of danger, but this movie makes it blatantly obvious that the entire army of villains doesn't stand a chance against him. Moore also sets his action to a rock music soundtrack, and grounds the film with an over-killing of camera styles, including slow motion shots and freeze frames.


His other problem, and this is the first time I've ever said this about a film, is that he could really use some transitional scenes, or something to show that a day has passed. There are several occurrences in this movie where characters do big things very quickly, or at least that is how it looks based on the fact that the scenery never changes.


Poor Gene Hackman and Owen Wilson. I guess we will have to wait for "The Royal Tenenbaums" to see if they work well together. The two seem to try forming a bond here, but their efforts look completely false. Both actors are just trapped behind a formula, with a director and writers who have no clue how to get them out.

TOP

?