?

 

Changing Lanes (2002)

 

Starring: Samuel L. Jackson, Ben Affleck
Director: Roger Michell

Rating: R

Studio: Paramount

Review Posted: 4.10.01

Spoilers: Minor

Rating: 3/10

 

By Dennis Landmann

 

It is hard and very sad to watch Samuel L. Jackson in a bad movie, especially since this is his first one. Written by Chap Taylor (a production assistant on three movies), Changing Lanes is a disappointment on many levels. Previews advertise the film as a semi-serious "road rage" drama and what crazy things can happen to two people after a car accident. These previews fail to capture the reality of the film, which suffers mostly from a script that is troubled and uninteresting.

 

The plot, I think, is best described if Sam Jackson does the talking. Here's what he said on Jay Leno (4.9.02), "It's actually about these two guys [Gavin Banek and Doyle Gibson] who have a fender-bender and during the course of the day, because one guy feels he has lost something because of what the other guy has done to him. He holds a particular item hostage so he can get it back. One guy does something to the other and another guy does something to the other, and before you knew it there is a lot of chaos, but they both end up growing a bit toward the end of the day."

 

The plot is basically that, but Jackson left out the most critical piece of information of all. The film takes place in one single day, which is completely impossible considering everything that happens. Both characters are not of much interest, even though it is kind of heart-breaking to watch Doyle Gibson's struggle to comfort his family and get his life back in order. Gavin Banek treats Gibson like scum through the film, but acts surprised when he receives the shit from underneath Gibson's shoes at one point during the film.

 

Changing Lanes depends on its characters, but they are all fabricated clichés of what is good and evil. Furthermore, the file Gibson has in his possession is the second thing the film depends on. It unwillingly becomes the latter for frustration and chaos between the two characters. The problem is, who wants to see a movie about a fucking file? The film attempts to make the audience care, but fails miserably.

 

Roger Michell, whose Notting Hill was quite a hit, did the best he could with the material. Samuel L. Jackson played his character with some dignity, but he was deeply undermined by Ben Affleck's trite and arrogant Gavin Banek. Most of their dialogue was based on hate and forgiveness, yet none of it paid off. This is partially due to Taylor's script, which also focused on too many locations and character interactions in New York. When I thought the most painful aspect to criticize is the day in which the entire film is set, the ending pretty much takes the prize. It's interesting to know the characters can all go home happy, yet the audience cannot.

 

In a nutshell, Changing Lanes is an unengaging film full of tired sequences and unbelievable coincidences. Moreover, when Jay Leno proclaims "it's one of the smartest pictures [he has] seen this year," you know something cannot be right. Changing Lanes probably looked interesting on the page, but as a film it does not.

?

    

Support this site

Buy great items

 

 

SOUNDTRACK

Buy the CD!