|
MOVIE REVIEW
Company, The
(2003)
Starring:
Neve Campbell, James Franco
Director:
Robert Altman
Rating: PG-13
Studio:
Sony Pictures Classics
Release Date: 12.25.03
Review
Posted: 01.16.04
Spoilers:
Minor
By
Sara M. Fetters
Beautiful
"Company" for Director Altman
You have to
admire Robert Altman. In nearly a half-century of filmmaking,
the noted director cannot be called out for playing it safe.
From “M.A.S.H.” to “McAbe and Mrs. Miller” to “The Long Goodbye”
to “Nashville” to “The Player” to “Short Cuts,” Altman is a proven
talent willing to take chances and bend the rules. More
importantly, he never does the same thing twice, each of his
films having that trademark flourish of ingenuity unmistakably
the director’s own.
Take his
latest, the ballet fable “The Company” featuring Neve Campbell
(“Scream”) and the acclaimed Joffrey Ballet of Chicago. As a
follow up to “Gosford
Park,” a movie that boasted Altman’s fifth Academy Award
nomination for directing, it is a 180-degree sideways turn into
the unusual. Eschewing the trademark large ensemble and
over-arching story structure the director is known for, this is
such an intimate portrait of the dancing troupe it could almost
be classified as documentary. Unlike most of his pictures,
individual performers aren’t given the opportunity to stand out.
Instead, it is the collective nature of the artistic medium that
is the focus, Altman introducing an almost stream of
conscience-like narrative that’s mesmerizing and distant all at
the same time.
If there is a
story to “The Company,” than I guess it would be about Joffrey
dancer Ry (Campbell) and her quest to become a featured
performer. She gets her opportunity when the lead female dancer
on the pas de deux My Funny Valentine is injured, Ry as
her understudy stepping in to do the performance. The thing is,
in a typical movie we’d then watch the young dancer slowly climb
her way to the top, the replaced woman fume and conspire to win
back her position, and the rest of the Joffrey dancers come to
grudgingly accept the beautiful and talented Ry over time.
The thing is,
this isn’t a usual movie. Instead of that tale, Altman and
co-writers Campbell – a former ballet dancer herself – and
Barbara Turner (“Pollock”) choose to show the ballet company for
what it is; a tribe of dreamers and artists intent on putting
ambitious visions onstage for the world to see. They work
endless hours, taking immaculate care of their bodies all in
their desire to dance. For all their trouble, they get constant
budget worries, very little pay and the terrifying knowledge
that any moment injury or age could sideline their dreams
forever. For most of us, this is a cup of tea worth passing. But
for the few that make the choice to sacrifice and live this
life, the beauty they bring unto the world is truly sublime.
Campbell, who
trained two years with the ballet to get in shape, is – at least
to my untrained eye – a marvel as a dancer. Her rendition of the
aforementioned My Funny Valentine with Joffrey principal
Domingo Rubio against the backdrop of a windy rainstorm is
simply gorgeous. The actress’ lean and lithe body seems to melt
into her partner, the duo casting a spell of intoxicating
elegance. As to her acting, it’s impossible to really comment.
While she is the featured player; we see her work a second job
as a waitress in a trendy gothic nightclub, romancing chef James
Franco (“Spider-Man”) and arguing with her mother; the movie
never lingers on her enough to really assess the performance.
In fact, the
only actor – and really the only other professional thespian
besides Campbell and Franco – given an opportunity to stand out
is veteran Malcolm McDowell (“A Clockwork Orange”). Playing the
Italian-American (?!) director of the Joffrey Ballet, McDowell
is so darn enthusiastic he completely won me over, even if he
does throw in a number of British colloquiums into his dialogue.
No matter, he’s so forceful, so authoritative, that I nearly
started to sit up in my seat at attention every time he came on
screen, mimicking the dancers as they in turn sat before him.
It should be
noted that “The Company” lives on stage. There are a good ten
dances performed, much of the movie’s running time taken up
showcasing them. Cinematographer Andrew Dunn (“The Madness of
King George”) frames these moments resplendently, letting his
camera lie still for long periods and then gracefully weaving in
and out of each ballet for a more intimate perspective.
The problem is,
all this time onstage leaves little room for story. Granted, as
there really isn’t one, maybe that’s not such a bad thing.
Still, there is a distancing between viewer and movie that’s
rather disconcerting. While little intimate moments can’t help
but stand out; I especially liked a scene in a cramped apartment
between owner and one of her (many) lodgers as she searches for
a condom; overall I never got a feel for whom any of these
dancers were as individuals. But then, it is the collective tale
of the troop Altman is obviously trying to tell, so maybe not
knowing is all part of the larger design.
If so, I can’t
say I approved. While I felt that tract worked in combat
pictures like Ridley Scott’s “Black Hawk Down” and (especially)
Terence Malick’s “The Thin Red Line,” it doesn’t come off as
well here. Yes, I know a season in the life of the Joffrey
Dancers – any dance troop, really – is probably much like going
to war; each injury, every fundraising dollar misspent or
un-raised an opportunity for disaster and ruin; but emotionally
it didn’t grab me the same way those others did.
Yet, I can’t
say that this stopped me from enjoying the picture. If anything,
I adored much about “The Company,” completely captivated by its
lyrically visual spell. That’s why I’m tempted to classify it
more as documentary than as feature film, Altman achieving
elegance behind the camera every bit as profound and moving as
the ballets being performed by the dancers. It’s a light, airy
motion picture that flows nimbly from scene to scene, producing
a dream-like spell over the audience impossible to escape.
Like great
art, “The Company” is unpredictable and daring, an original work
indicative of a master intent on flexing his creative muscles.
And even if it doesn’t operate quite as well as the director
hopes, at least it takes chances and conveys the audience on a
journey they might never have experienced, otherwise. Even if
Altman and his picture hits some lumps, the movie is still a
ravishing waltz, as one-of-a-kind as the filmmaker once again
dancing to his own tune.
Rating:
êêê (out of 4)
TOP
|