|
Day After
Tomorrow, The
(2004)
Starring:
Dennis Quaid, Jake Gyllenhaal, Sela Ward, Ian Holm
Director: Roland Emmerich
Rating: PG-13
Distributor:
20th Century Fox
Release Date:
05.28.04
Review
Posted: 05.28.04
Spoilers: Minor
By
Sara M. Fetters
Disaster Ahead! -
"The
Day After Tomorrow” One Day Too Many
Roland Emmerich must have a thing against New York.
First, the
unbelievably successful writer/director obliterated the city and its
inhabitants with alien weaponry in the silly sci-fi mish-mash
“Independence Day.” Then, only a few short years later, he unleashed
Tokyo’s very own scaly menace Godzilla on the unsuspecting populace.
Now he turns the full fury of Mother Nature herself against the Big
Apple, the giant metropolis buried under tidal waves, blizzards and
air so cold it turns the citizenry into life-size human ice cubes.
My gut tells
me this is one man who’s not getting the key to the city any time
soon.
All kidding
aside, Emmerich isn’t a subtle director. He loves to blow things up,
whether they be heads (“The Patriot”), temples (“Stargate”) or, in the
case of his latest effort “The Day After Tomorrow,” the entire
Northern Hemisphere. Wind swirls pictorially into shimmering vortexes
of majestic terror, snow falls like daggers, mountain sides tumble
with Wagnerian wrath and people are frozen, impaled, smashed, drowned
and catapulted into deathly submission. It is a beautifully rendered,
large-scale motion picture full of epic swagger showcasing sights and
sounds seldom seen in a movie theater.
It also stinks
to high heaven, and enduring this piece of cinematic hokum is akin to
eating seven month old Easter Eggs: They may look pretty, but they’ll
sure as heck give you food poisoning.
So does this.
Not since Irwin Allen hit his nadir with, um, classics
(strictly of the “Mystery Science 3000” variety) like “The Swarm” and
“Earthquake” has there been a disaster flick quite as silly and inane
as this. And, much like those, there is much campy goodness to be
found amidst all the mediocrity, an extremely talented cast
floundering helplessly amidst the clichés, stupidity and highly
stilted melodrama.
As in all
disaster movies, there is always the single Everyman who just knows
things aren’t right and, gosh darn it all, if people only would just
listen to him before it is too late he’s positive he could save the
day. This time, that man is government climatologist Jack Hall (Dennis
Quaid, “Innerspace”). He’s come to the conclusion that all those pesky
ozone emissions and greenhouse gases we’ve been foolishly emitting the
last few decades are slowly melting the polar ice caps, their
super-cold drippings irreversibly changing the temperatures of the
Earth’s ocean currents. If things don’t change, the planet could be in
for a second Ice Age.
Of course he’s
right, and no one, including the Vice President of the United States,
wants to listen to him about it, especially when he radically suggests
evacuating the entire northern half of the country. Soon New York is
flooding and Canada has turned into a giant frozen icebox, and
wouldn’t you know it but Jack’s own son Sam (Jake Gyllenhaal, “The
Good Girl”) is trapped with a few hundred other Apple-tonians in the
central library. As the city slowly turns into a frozen wonderland,
Jack manages to tell his son to stay put and keep warm for he’s coming
to save him, and Ice Age or not there is no way he’s going to let his
son turn into frost-covered Popsicle.
This is an
idiot movie made by people with the wealth of six Donald Trumps at
their disposal. In fact, if you happen to be a sadomasochist who gets
off on watching beautifully rendered scenes of destruction, than by
all means “The Day After Tomorrow” is just the ticket for you. The
effects here are every bit as startling and overwhelming as the
trailers promised. Just when you think Emmerich and his team of
technicians can’t top themselves, they then go and turn the greatest
tidal wave in motion picture history against the city of New York.
In all
honesty, these moments do have a trenchant power. That flooding, in
particular, is awe-inspiring. Scenes of waves flowing serpent-like
through the crowded city streets are shockingly effective, wrenching
the gut like a jackhammer. I particularly liked the way they crashed
and smashed up against the Statue of Liberty before making their way
into the city itself. It’s a terrifying sequence, a startling reminder
of the very type of spectacle Hollywood can excel at and brings home
the fury of a mad-as-hell Mother Nature.
But so what?
“The Day After Tomorrow” is such a mess of cliché and unintentional
hilarity it’s impossible to care about the characters or their plight.
The director, along with co-screenwriter Jeffrey Nachmanoff
(“Hollywood Palms”), have constructed a farce of a disaster flick that
leaves no long-lasting staple of the genre unturned. Want some
marauding beasts to terrorize the heroes? Why not a pack of laughably
CGI-generated wolves inexplicably able to escape from the Central Park
Zoo. Need a child stoically facing death? Then how about a Leukemia
patient (who just happens to be going blind) unintentionally left
behind by the hospital staff with only Doctor – and Jack’s ex-wife –
Lucy Hall (Sela Ward, “The Fugitive”) remaining at his bedside. Need
romance? Your fix is the giddily asinine misty-eyed affair between Sam
and fellow classmate Laura (Emmy Rossum, “Mystic
River”), one in which the young hero will have to – gasp! – consider
amputating his beloved’s leg.
Speaking of
those CGI wolves, when will filmmakers get it through their thick
skulls that just because a computer allows you to do something, that
doesn’t necessarily mean you should? While computer effects technology
is undeniably impressive – those panoramic scenes of Lady Liberty
underneath ice and snow are incredible – that still doesn’t mean
they’re effective, especially where it comes to bringing animals to
life. They look glossy and fake, more suited to a computer game or a
cartoon. The wolves’ first appearance onscreen sent the preview
audience into fits of laughter, and Sam’s running from them only made
things worse. These canines are a needless addition to an already
laborious film, superfluous and obviously phony much like everything
else surrounding them.
Poor Dennis
Quaid, just as soon as you thought the actor was solidifying his
comeback now he has to wipe the muck of this mess off. Long a favorite
of mine (I could watch “The Big Easy” and “Innerspace” until the cows
come home), it was hard to believe the actor would ever have another
heyday after bombing out in film after film in the ‘90’s. But after
daringly distinct turns in “Frequency,” “The Rookie,” “Traffic” and,
especially, “Far From Heaven,” I was sure he was about to enter a new
golden age. But now, with the failure of “The Alamo” and the absurdly
turgid silliness of this picture, Quaid finds himself once more in
trouble and I just don’t see that pearly 100-watt smile digging him
out.
On the upside, I’m starting to get the feeling
audiences are becoming less and less inclined to tolerate this type of
hokum. Much like my experiences watching “Van Helsing” with a
particularly unenthusiastic preview audience, those at this film’s
preview couldn’t help but laugh and snicker and make jokes at the
movie’s expense. Now, with Hugh Jackman’s monster mash not the
monstrous smash studio executives (although at already $100 million
it’s not exactly a failure) clearly hoped, there is optimism Emmerich
and his cheesy monstrosity might just meet the very same fate. If
there is any justice in the world than the day after tomorrow will
hopefully be the last one this disaster sees.
Film Rating:
ê1/2 (out of
4)
Home | Back to Top |