|
Miracle
(2004)
Starring:
Kurt Russell,
Noah Emmerich, Patricia Clarkson
Director:
Gavin O'Connor
Rating: PG
Studio:
Walt Disney
Release Date:
02.06.04
Review
Posted: 02.06.04
Spoilers:
Minor
By
Sara M. Fetters
"Miracle" on Screen - Olympic
Triumph Spectacular Entertainment
In 1980, the
United States was not a happy place. The gas lines of the late
seventies were shortening, but still prevalent. Interest rates were
high, the country’s economy mired in mediocrity. On the world front,
Russia invaded Afghanistan and the U.S. was perceived as being
powerless to do anything about it. Even worse, the Ayatollah came to
power in Iran taking multiple Americans hostage, the President
Carter’s attempt to rescue them a spectacularly bloody mistake.
The country
needed a spark – something to make it stand up; something to make it
feel proud; something to give people hope.
America needed a wake-up
call, and anything even remotely optimistic would do. What they got
were 20 hockey players and one hungry coach, all eager to prove that
the letters “U,” “S” and “A” meant something. So on a cold February
day in Lake Placid, this band of youngsters did the unthinkable,
beating the Russian hockey team in the Olympic semifinal on their way
to a gold medal. Quite simply, it was a miracle, and just the sort
America was waiting for.
Walt Disney,
after back-to-back hits with “Remember the Titans” and 2002’s
excellent “The Rookie,” turns its attention to this singular moment in
United States athletic history with “Miracle.” Even though everyone
knows the story, even though there isn’t a moment of doubt how it ends
up, director Gavin O’Connor’s (“Tumbleweeds”) film is the first stand
up and cheer event picture of 2004. It is a mesmerizing, rollicking
good time of a movie, the type that puts a lump in the throat, tear in
the eye and a smile on the face, all at the same time.
O’Connor and
rookie screenwriter Eric Guggenheim focus their film on legendary
hockey coach Herb Brooks (Kurt Russell, “Dark Blue, “Vanilla Sky”) and
his determination crafting the perfect team to beat the Russian Red
Army juggernaut. Considered by many to be the best hockey team in the
world (and in some sports circles considered the greatest team of all
time), the Russians had proven their world superiority time and
time again. This included demolishing a vaunted All-Star team from the
NHL, the supposed best players in the world nothing more than chattel
to this Eastern Block powerhouse.
Brooks decided
the best way to beat the Soviets was to play like the Soviets,
adopting their style of speed, passing, conditioning and physicality
melding it with the Canadian and European schools of hockey. It was a
hybrid system, constructed with one singular purpose in mind: beat the
Russians.
It was a risky
gamble. With only a short period of time to teach his players the
system, was it possible to completely reinvent the American game of
hockey before the Olympic games? Never mind that the U.S. hadn’t won a
medal since their 1960 gold. In most peoples’ minds the best Brooks
and his squad could hope for was to not make fools of themselves,
while at worst this complete reinvention of American hockey could lead
to world-wide embarrassment.
Of course, we
know this wasn’t the case. Brooks got it right, somehow egging his
players on to defeat the most storied amateur athletic team in
history. The Russians hadn’t lost on Olympic match since 1960, every
country in the world seemingly ceding the top podium position to them
before the games even began. Heck, even the sportscasters considered a
Soviet win a forgone conclusion, the pundits patting the American team
on the back for making it to the medal round but not giving them even
a fool’s chance to win.
But not
Brooks. Assembling a team of rough’n’tumble collegiate athletes, most
from Massachusetts and Minnesota, the coach schooled them tirelessly
in his newfangled view of the game, mercilessly challenging them to be
greater than the sums of their singular parts. Sacrificing any
personal relationships, Brooks took to them like a drill sergeant,
beating his ideas into them day-in and day-out. He forced them to bond
together, not with him, and in doing so the team struck bonds of love
and togetherness that hold true today.
Russell is
simply fantastic as Brooks. One of the most underrated actors in the
history of American film, he finds away to make the doggerel coach
sympathetic and lovable, stripping away his didactic and militant
façade to reveal a deeply caring human being who loved his players
more than he could ever admit. It is a deep, passionate performance
full of longing, regret, hope, love and determination, the fire
burning behind Russell’s eyes constantly fueling the picture to even
greater heights.
Adding sublime
support is recent “Pieces of April” Oscar-nominee Patricia Clarkson as
Brooks’ long-suffering wife Patty. With only a few, slightly
underwritten scenes to do it in Clarkson fleshes out the character
imbuing “Miracle” with her stoic resolve. This should be a throwaway
role, the token forgotten female to Russell’s central figure. Clarkson
won’t have it, the actress sharing a potent, heated chemistry with the
lead that’s passionately expressive. The requisite moment where the
two verbally spar over Brooks’ emotional aloofness works amazingly
well almost in spite of itself, the two actors so good they bring
things to a hearty boil.
I wish I could
say the rest of the cast fares as well as these two. Unfortunately,
Guggenheim fails to give the members of the U.S. Olympic Team much
individual personality. We never get a chance to know whom these guys
are or why they seem to wholeheartedly buy into Brooks’ bellicose
system. They all end up being enigmas, interchangeable cogs in a film
seemingly with room for only one distinct character.
Yet, while
this tactic unfortunately distances the players from the audience as
individuals, as a collective whole they are still quite endearing.
Watching them suffer through practice after practice, seeing them
sweat blood and bust heads out on the ice, it is hard not to root for
them even though it is a forgone conclusion they’re going to come out
victorious. Heck, even the cliché-filled scenes somehow ring true, a
player shouting he plays for the United States of America enough to
make even the hardest-hearted cynic cheer.
On top of
that, O’Connor paces his film beautifully, subtlety building to the
climactic game with a showman’s grace. He and cinematographer Daniel
Stoloff (“Tumbleweeds”) achieve a breathtaking, brutally warp-speed
look at hockey, creating a you-are-there symmetry inside the
U.S./Russian game that’s borderline awesome. It’s all edited with
crackerjack precision by John Gilroy (“Narc”), the movie weaving and
bobbing through many of the games more intimate facets with the
unwavering refinement of a speed skating ballerina. I also liked that
O’Connor chose to use the actual 1980 Al Michael/Ken Dryden commentary
as the only real audio support during the classic semifinal match. I
can’t imagine anyone being able to duplicate his classic, “Do you
believe in miracles?” exclamation and I’m certainly glad the
filmmakers didn’t try.
It is
interesting that this movie is coming out now. With record
unemployment, an economy struggling to come to life and American
soldiers dying daily half a world away, the U.S. seems perilously
close to the same sort of doldrums it faced a quarter century a go.
While it is doubtful another sporting event can lift the collective
consciousness the way this one did, the timing still couldn’t be
better to be reminded of this game. Maybe that is the greatest miracle
of “Miracle.” Not only does it remind us of one of sport’s greatest
moments; it also reminds us of the wondrous achievements human beings
can accomplish if they set their sights high enough. Whether in
sports, politics or in daily lives, this is something that cannot be
stated enough.
Film Rating:
êêê (out of 4)
Home | Back to Top |