|
MOVIE REVIEW
Open Range
(2003)
Starring:
Robert Duvall, Kevin Costner, Annette Bening
Director:
Kevin Costner
Rating: R
Studio:
Touchstone
Release Date: 8.15.03
Review
Posted: 8.15.03
Spoilers:
Minor
By
Sara Michelle Fetters
Costner
Rebounds with Flawed Western Opus "Open Range"
Kevin Costner
hasn’t had an impressive run of luck of late. Most of his recent
films, save the engrossing “Thirteen Days,” have been nothing
more than unmitigated disasters. From “The Postman” to “3,000
Miles to Graceland” to “Dragonfly,” the actor’s track record
isn’t exactly exemplary. In fact, you have to go all the way
back to 1996’s Ron Shelton golf comedy/drama “Tin Cup” to find
Costner’s last out-and-out success, the time since being
especially unkind to the thespian both commercially and
personally.
Now he
ventures back into the director’s chair for the third time with
the western opus “Open
Range.”
While I’d like to report that the film is more akin to “Dances
with Wolves” than it is “The Postman,” the reality is that the
film unfortunately lies somewhere inexplicably between the two.
There is a rich, satisfying drama enmeshed within the pages of
Craig Storper’s (working from the novel “The Open Range Men” by
Lauren Paine) screenplay, yet Costner the director can only find
bits and pieces of it. What he does find, however, makes for
some of the richest and most satisfyingly character-driven
dramatics of the year, making the schizophrenic awfulness of the
some of the rest that much more difficult to understand.
Aging cowboy
Boss Spearman (Robert Duvall) has been freegrazing – roaming the
American west and living off the land – his cattle for a long
time now, the last decade spent with near-silent partner Charley
Waite (Costner) has. Also joining their small group is the
burly-but-kind-hearted Mose (“E.R.'s" Abraham Benrubi) and the
precocious 16-year-old foreigner Button (Diego Luna, “Frida,”
“Yu Mamá También”). Together, this tight-knit group wanders the
west with their herd, only making their way into local towns for
supplies when absolutely necessary.
After a
particularly vicious multi-day rainstorm beds them down and
scatters their cattle, Boss sends Mose back to Harmonville, a
small local town they passed earlier for supplies as he and the
others wrangle up the rest of the herd and get ready to move
out. But when the big man doesn’t return, both Boss and Charley
get more than a little worried as to what has become of the big
man. Leaving Button with the herd the duo head into town to try
and track down their friend and get their supplies so they can
take their cows and move on to dryer pastures.
Once in town
the two discover Mose in jail and Harmonville under the thumb of
malicious rancher Denton Baxter (Michael Gambon, “Charlotte
Gray,” “Gosford Park”) and the bought-and-paid-for town sheriff
Poole (James Russo, “The Ninth Gate,” “The Postman”). Baxter
doesn’t take kindly to freegrazers, and he wants Spearman and
his cattle gone from the territory one way or another. Taking
their man in hand, Boss and Charley return to the herd expecting
the worst.
The worst is
what they get as Baxter’s men, while both Charley and Boss away
scouting for assassins, assault the camp killing Mose and
wounding Button. Taking their injured young friend into the
residence of Doc Barlow (TV movie veteran Dean McDermott) and
his sister Sue (Annette Bening, “American Beauty,” “Bugsy”),
the duo know that justice – even if it costs them their own
lives – must be had. But the line between justice and vengeance
is a blurry one, and it will take every ounce of each man’s grit
to make sure one doesn’t transform into the other.
Considering
the lofty themes presented in Costner’s Oscar-winning epic
“Dances with Wolves” (and even those attempted in the ill-fated
“The Postman”), “Open Range” is a surprisingly simple affair. A
moralistic fable about the nature of truth and justice in a
lawless environment, the movie purports to adhere to the classic
western stereotypes of honor, friendship and freedom while at
the same time delving deep into the hearts of these enigmatic
men.
In many ways,
Costner the director succeeds at doing just this. Both Boss and
Charley are amazingly well-drawn characters. At first appearing
to be nothing more than just the classic strong, silent western
hero archetypes, Storper’s screenplay delicately and subtly
delves much deeper than that as these two friends slowly open up
to one another and reveal much about their pasts as danger
slowly engulfs them. It is interesting watching the walls the
two have put up for their own emotional protection slowly
crumble, each actor relishing the chance to play such richly
drawn and complex characters to the point where both Costner and
Duvall slowly disappear inside of the them.
In fact, this
is the director’s best performance as an actor in ages. It’s
been all-too easy in recent years to make fun of Costner for his
acting prowess. In fact, his accents in “Robin Hood: Prince of
Thieves,” “Message in a Bottle” and “Thirteen Days” are the
stuff of legend, entering the pantheon of bad accents on display
in a major motion picture. What people forget, though, is that
his problem with accents aside, Costner can be one heck of a
grand actor when he wants to be. His loosey-goosey portrayals in
“Bull Durham” and “Tin Cup” are wondrous, while his earnest
All-American savvy was integral to the success of the dramatic
thrillers “No Way Out” and “The Untouchables.” In fact, his
funny, touching, sad and emotionally uplifting performance in
“Field of Dreams” might just rank as one of the best male
performances of the 80’s, not a bad feat for someone so
cherished in the bad accent hall of fame.
With Charley
Waite, Costner has really found a role that fits him. Showing
flashes of the sly humor reminiscent of his portrayal as catcher
Crash Davis in “Bull Durham,” the actor also displays a quietly
devastating humanity that’s long been absent from his work. I
really felt for Waite, decades of non-stop killing slowly
eroding his soul, this final fight with Baxter either going to
be his salvation or the final step to his eternal
self-damnation.
But as good
as Costner the actor is, it is Costner the director that makes
the best move by allowing the great Duvall the central (and top
billed) role in the picture. As a character, Boss Spearman rates
right up there with the actor’s best creations like “Lonesome
Dove’s” Augustus ‘Gus’ McCrae and “The Godfather’s” Tom Hagen.
This is an astonishingly deep and ornately veiled performance
the likes of which a film critic longs to see, a stirring
portrait that can only live on past the lifespan of the film in
which it was given. With a career spanning over four decades and
so many of just these types of performances to his resume, it is
long past when Duvall should be given his due as one of
America’s greatest character actors.
If only “Open
Range” were as good as the performances that inhabit it. Costner
the director gets so much of the film right; it is more than a
shame when things go horribly and stiflingly wrong. There are
moments that are so boneheaded, so beyond comprehension, I had
trouble rationalizing the film was the work of just one
director. Clichéd images of a dead dog and long-winded speeches
about what it means to be a man are so insipidly staged and
thought out I wanted to scream. What’s worse, these moments just
seem to go on and on without end, almost erasing the good
feelings and strong emotions generated by a scene just moments
before.
It doesn’t
help that Storper’s screenplay makes so many of the periphery
characters nothing more than one-dimensional western stock
figures. The great Gambon is relegated to nothing more than
foul-tempered heavy, while the gifted Bening is stuck playing
the weary woman waiting for that one good man. It is a testament
to both actor’s skills that they manage to come off as well as
they do, however, both investing far more time and energy into
their portrayals then screenplay does in fleshing them out.
Just as I
thought the whole thing was going to implode in on itself,
Costner finally unleashes the guns and stages a rousing climax
in and around the dusty streets of Harmonville. A cacophony of
unrehearsed violence and mayhem, this battle has just the right
chaotic feel as to what a gun battle of this sort must have felt
like. If anything, bullets miss their mark far more than they
hit, and there is a bloody repercussion to all the pandemonium
the resonates far deeper than a blood-splattered flesh wound. In
fact, as newly empowered residents of the town maliciously chase
down and shoot a fleeing Baxter crony, the inherent humor of the
scene is powerfully diluted by the look upon haggard killer
Waite’s face. By bringing a forceful justice to Harmonville, has
more harm here been done than good?
Unfortunately, that idea doesn’t seem to interest Costner as
much as sending audiences out with the sight of Charley and Sue
in loving embrace. I was hoping that the film was going to end
on a coda as darkly perverse and exciting as the one presented
in that scene, instead Storper’s screenplay reverts back to
lachrymose cliché and Costner pours on more of Michael Kamen’s
(“Die Hard,” “Mr. Holland’s Opus”) interminable score.
In the end,
it’s hard to know exactly what to make of “Open Range.” So much
of it is right on; from debut cinematographer James Muro’s lush
visuals to Gae S. Buckley’s exquisite production design to John
Bloomfield’s (“The Mummy Returns”) excellent costumes; and much
of the casting so perfect; the great Michael Jeter (“The Fisher
King,” “Jurassic Park III”) gets his best role in years; that I
justly wanted to love this movie. And at times I did, drawn
deeply into Costner and Duvall’s vivid characterizations and
Storper’s emotionally complex screenplay. But so many moments
rang just as clearly false as the did true that “Open Range” is
nothing more than an enigma; a seemingly complex parable of the
west just as clearly at war with itself inasmuch are the
characters that wander the wind-swept prairies within it.
Rating:
êê1/2
(out of 4)
TOP
|