|

Russian Ark / Russkij
kovcheg
(2002) Starring:
Sergei Dreiden, Mariya Kuznetsova, et al.
Director:
Aleksandr Sokurov
Rating: NR
Studio:
Wellspring Cinema
Review
Posted: 9.25.02
Spoilers:
Minor
Rating: 3/4
By
Harvey S. Karten.
Two decades ago, when the Soviet
Union was an empire more evil than the regimes of North Korea,
Iraq and Iran combined, I found myself in St. Petersburg, and
what traveler to that westernized town could avoid the
Hermitage? With a temperature of one hundred degrees outside
and, considering that whatever Russian was hired to install air
conditioning must have gotten lost on his way, that place was
hot. So hot, in fact, that I found it hard to appreciate the
bounty of the czars, but I was entranced by the way my fellow
tourists carefully pronounced the place Uhr mih TAZH, as though
the place were in Paris as indeed it might have been.
If only Aleksandr Sokurov's film
came out in 1982 instead of just now, I could have avoided the
stuffiness of the museum, sitting back in air conditioned
comfort in an American movie theater to see the paintings. But
there's more. While Sokurov's fantasia looks at some of the
creations of El Greco, Van Dyke and others, it puts us in a time
capsule wherein we float through Russian history from the time
of Peter the Great through the ill- fated regime of Nicholas II.
In other words we see the membes of the court as they walk,
prance, and dance through the chambers! Seeing the movie won't
help you to pass the World History Regents exam since, after
all, this merely skips merrily through some high points of life
among the Russian aristocracy. But what a dream for lovers of
costumes, pageantry, olde worlde splendor, a time gone forever
to the regret of at least the principal character of the slender
story.
In fact "Russian Ark" is,
literally, a dream, one enjoyed by director Sokurov in more ways
than one. The arc of the story is like that of a pleasant
nocturnal trip that the viewer might even take, having gone to
bed after seeing the 96-minute pageant. On an equal plane is the
dream of a film geek who loves pictures that break technical
ground. What Sokurov does with the ample help of his
photographer, Tilman Buttner, is to use a Steadicam camera with
some brand new stuff, features which could cause a labor strike
by film editors since it does away with them altogether. Though
two thousand actors and extras rehearsed for eight months, the
entire film was shot in one day and, get this, without a single
break! This means if just one person messed up, say, had too
much Stoly while putting on his finery, not only would he
probably been beaten to a pulp by the rest of the cast, but the
entire project would have gone kaput. The Hermitage Museum in
St. Pete's was shut down for just that one day to allow a Sony
HDW-F900 camera to shoot the entire film in one fell swoop,
using a hard disk recording system with a battery that would
make Mr. Duracell envious. This system could record up to one
hundred minutes of uncompressed image, but it could do so only
once.
What do we get for all this
technological breakthrough? We get time travel without the lame
special effects of an H.G. Wells production such as Simon Wells
used in his rendition of "The Time Machine" earlier this year,
but with a lot more glitter. The glitter comes not from computer
imagery but from real human beings. In the unseen director's
dream, he meets a Nineteenth Century French marquis (Sergei
Dreiden) who somehow arrives at the Hermitage, a guy who lived
before the unification of Germany and before the advent of
Richard Wagner who proves this by not knowing what the director
is talking about when he mentions that country and that
composer. This marquis struts about, occasionally chased away by
the guards, as he engages in some playful palaver with the
director who is invisible to everyone else. He looks at some of
the sculptures and wonders why the Russians seem to have such
little confidence in their own ideas and so much love for things
European. He examines paintings and explains the meaning of
symbols, such as the chicken and the cat in one such European
piece of art.
When the French diplomat is tired
of Peter the Great's court, he advances through the decades at
the Winter Palace of the czars, which is now the aforementioned
Hermitage, watching the aristos of the court shuffle about,
culminating in a slam-bang conclusion Czar Nicholas II's huge
cotillion-type ball in which gents and their ladies bounce about
to a mazurka played by an orchestra under the direction of
Valery Gergiev. The final scene has all the drama of Anton
Chekhov's "The Cherry Orchard," except that instead of the
felling of a prized tree, the scene changes to an ominous,
foggy, black and white to symbolize the coming revolution. In
the most wrenching piece of dialogue, the unseen director urges
the French diplomat to come on, to move on, but the Frenchman
wants to stay there in the Winter Palace who can blame him?
"Russian Ark" played at the major
festivals: Telluride, Toronto, and the New York Film Festival,
and is not meant for the audience of sci-fi buffs who went for
"The Time Machine" or fantasy lovers whose idea of greatness if
"Lord of the Rings." This is a mature, deeply felt work by a man
whose oeuvre includes nineteen documentaries and thirteen
features, the best-known here in the U.S being "Mother and Son."
"Russian Ark" could inspire its audience to visit the Hermitage
not me, because as I say I'd rather sit in an air conditioned
theater and listen to the guided tour of the paintings and might
be a bit disappointed if I failed to see the handsome couples
dancing through its many rooms. Darn that Lenin!
TOP
|