?

 

Serendipity (2001)

 

Starring: John Cusack, Kate Beckinsale, Jeremy Piven
Director: ?

Rating: PG-13

Studio: Miramax

Review Posted: 10.21.01

Spoilers: Minor

Rating: 2/4

 

By Michael McLarney.

"If it's true that love doesn't play fair, then I suppose it
stands to reason that neither does the new romantic comedy "Serendipity." It's another one of those fairy tale romances complete with young, attractive, star-crossed lovers whose respective paths to emotional consummation rest in the palm of fate. Ah, fate ... a dubious concept, I do believe. Oh, it's a pleasant enough thought ... that somewhere in the world is that one special person whom you're meant to know, love, understand, and grow old with. A "soul mate" who both challenges and supports you through all of life's trials and tribulations; one who no matter how far away they venture, will always be mysteriously drawn back into your loving embrace, right? Of course, the loophole of fate is that it operates under the assumption that
both individuals speared by Cupid's arrow will find each other equally captivating. If they do, it's destiny. If only one does, then the previous sentences are just cause for a restraining order.


I know my cynicism is rearing its ugly head here, and perhaps my stance on fate has no place in a review of an essentially good-natured romantic comedy. Yet I find it hard to get emotionally involved in a romance where the only reason to root for the lovers is that one is
played by John Cusack and the other is played by Kate Beckinsale. Yes, they're both charming. Yes, they're both likable. Yes, they're both attractive (my female friends repeatedly convey their lust toward Cusack, while I'm estimating that at least one-and-a-half of
my two star review is attributed to the fact that Beckinsale looks absolutely gorgeous), and yes, they're both a little too intelligent and level-headed to appear in such a simple minded premise.


Jonathan Trager (Cusack) and Sara Thomas (Beckinsale) are two strangers in the vast metropolis of Manhattan who happen to meet on a bustling shopping day as they both reach for the same pair of gloves. An immediate attraction exists. After engaging in some playful small talk, they decide to go for coffee. Despite both being
involved in somewhat serious relationships, they nonetheless soon find themselves wandering around the city, discussing such things as their favorite colors, movies, and various "New York moments." As the evening winds down, Jonathan asks for her phone number. Not convinced they are "meant" to be together, Sara issues some rather numbing tests, one involving the odds that they'll enter different elevators at the Waldorf Astoria and arrive at the exact same floor.
Through an unfortunate circumstance (caused by a nasty little boy dressed as Satan, no less), the elevators don't meet up and the lost souls sadly go their separate ways. Cut to years later. Both are involved in relationships (he to a kind but somewhat uptight socialite, she to a pretentious Yanni wannabe), but still think about what might have been. As clues begin to surface telling them they were indeed meant for each other, they both embark on a quest for what they fear
got lost in life's shuffle.


For all my ranting on romance and destiny, I must confess that "Serendipity" isn't without its charms. I liked Cusack, was captivated by Beckinsale, and did find certain elements of Marc Klein's screenplay rather funny. I also enjoyed the performances from the supporting players, particularly John Corbett as Sara's endearingly self-absorbed musician boyfriend and Eugene Levy's
ultra-anal Bloomingdale's salesman. Yet despite the plusses, the movie expects us to believe that there is something at stake here. There isn't. The intentions are sweet enough, but the film is noticeably empty. Much has been made regarding the movie's trailer in that it gives away the entire plot. That's not really a marketing
blunder; there just isn't much to the story itself. I don't know how they could have advertised the film without telegraphing where it's headed.


Look, I don't have a problem with the idea of predestination, even as it may or may not apply to fairy tale romance. But what I do find rather humorous is the relative seriousness that many individuals seem to attach to the notion. You know who those people
are? No, not the raging beauties seen in flicks like "Serendipity," but those unfortunate loveless couples embroiled in bitterness, who as a result split their fifteen minutes of fame on talk shows or lowest common denominator court shows. You know, between the hours
of three and five in the afternoon, when channel surfing atop the highest waves of Syndication Hell, on "Springer" or "Ricki" or "Divorce Court" ... those are the people I'm willing to bet place a disquietingly potent emphasis on the power of destiny.


And I believe them. I do. It had to be fate. I mean, what else could have thrown these people into their melting pots of madness. Just watch these folks for a few minutes and tell me, do you think honesty ever came into the equation? That these individuals were true to themselves and forthcoming about what they saw in those they supposedly loved? Fate isn't a prerequisite to love. It's a crutch to insecurity. The
characters in "Serendipity" seem far too emotionally mature to be mired in such a concept. They're not assisted by fate, they're burdened by it.

TOP

?

Buy this Poster

Buy the CD

 

FOR SALE

 

Feel like shopping for DVDs today?

 

Check out the DVD Store!

 

Also Available

For Purchase:

 

POSTERS

SCRIPTS

BOOKS

CD's